Pages

Friday, October 31, 2008

Shreveport Judge-elect insists on Racial Segregation

Pamela Lattier, who was recently elected to a Shreveport City judgeship, has requested that City Marshal Charlie Caldwell provide her courtroom with only black deputy marshals.
When asked about it, Caldwell said 'I guess I didn't really think nothing about it because I'm black. I really didn't'.
If a white judge had asked for only white bailiffs he would be out the door - fast.
In light of her racism, the logical question is whether she can be fair to white defendants.

5 comments:

  1. Let's get one thing straight. One of the main rules is:

    BLACKS CANNOT BE RACISTS

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bill, I think you're right. Funny how that works, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it's funny that she wants only black deputies in her court room but sent her daughter to Calvary Baptist Academy up until this year. Calvary is private predominately white school. She only sent her to public school after she was running for judge.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Being a friend of the family, I can honestly say that where her daughter goes to school or why she's not there anymore had nothing to do with the elections--nor is it relevant to this allegation of 'racism.' She's no Judge Mablean Ephraim or Glenda Hatchett, but regardless of who's the baliff, Justice Will Be Served!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shreveport this judge should have been removed from the bench when I filed a complaint against her with the louisiana 's judiciary, ethics, supreme court, usdoj,and the louisiana house of Representatives asking for 2/3 of a vote for her removal, she should be on the other side of the bench as a defendant in federal court and I have proof Shreveport, people the u.s. government wrote me after I gave them my court records that was withheld from me until 2 months before my statue of limitation ran out, a violation of the Brady doctrine with no pretrial discovery, unlawful fake bogus subpoenas with no judge signature and no witnesses because there was never a crime committed and the officer told her and city prosecutor and they illegally used the officer name as a witness to testify against me who said he would not lie for them Shreveport, next I spent more than the time in jail the charge calls for a guilty verdict double and was never found guilty, after I sent my withheld court records to 6 federal agencies showing this ,Shreveport they was like really and I filed charges against the city of Shreveport, state of louisiana and every federal agencies and news media wrote me back and the actualof louisiana did a interview with me, people I tell you they knew they was lying and I named every louisiana federal appeals fifth circuit court rulings and us supreme court ruled into federal laws similar to my case and my case was dismissed and still no witnesses and this judge had been refusing to dismiss my case and excuse herself after lying about having a strong case and a witness, Shreveport it is egregious malicious prosecution, wrongfully conviction and I was offered 20 plea deals and then I still refused and she excused herself, I left the court house everybody was talking about it when they found out about it, judges,city attorneys, city Marshall's and the louisiana state supreme court, judiciary, ethics, attorney discipline and bar was on the phone talking at the court house, when the last day I was in court I gave them a letter from the president of the United States who said it's a shame and the fbi was there with the envelope I mailed them and the us doj , I wanted federal officials to bring charges against everyone of them and the state of louisiana Shreveport, everytime they seen me it was like Moses parting the red sea Shreveport, I took on Shreveport city court, city attorney, clerk of court, city Marshall's, city jail and the state of louisiana, next people got fired Shreveport behind all of this but not the two who should have this judge and prosecutor

    ReplyDelete

Rules of the road:
1. No personal attacks or insults.
2. No accustory statements about wrongdoing or criminal acts against anyone.
3. Say all you want about the pros and cons concerning the candidates and the issues, or the general subject of the blog post, just follow Rule #1 and Rule #2.