Monday, March 18, 2013

Activists Re-Launch Campaign to Repeal Louisiana's Creationism Law

Senator Karen Carter Peterson (D-New Orleans) recently filed SB 26 to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act, Louisiana’s misnamed and misguided creationism law. 
Since its passage in 2008, the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA) has been the subject of national and international criticism and ridicule, and its repeal has been endorsed an overwhelming consensus of scientists and educators and a broad coalition of religious leaders and clergy. This is the Senator Peterson’s third attempt at repealing the act.  
Previous hearings about the Louisiana Science Education Act were the focus of intense national interest.  Videos of the meetings have collectively received more than 680,000 views on YouTube and were covered by national publications including io9 and Slate.  The campaign has been covered both nationally and internationally, including in The Guardian, The Boston Globe, The Huffington Post, The Washington Post, Italian Vogue, MSNBC, and Bill Moyers’s “Moyers and Company.”  
Originally conceived as the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act, the LSEA is based on a model statute developed by the Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based think tank that lobbies for legislation promoting creationism in the classroom.
State Senator Ben Nevers, the bill's original sponsor, explained that he filed the bill at the behest of the Louisiana Family Forum. "They (the Louisiana Family Forum) believe that scientific data related to creationism should be discussed when dealing with Darwin's theory," Senator Nevers said.
Nobel laureate chemist Sir Harry Kroto said, “The present situation (the LSEA) should be likened to requiring Louisiana school texts to include the claim that the sun goes round the Earth.”
Three years ago, Sir Harry Kroto was the first Nobel laureate to publicly endorse the act’s repeal. Today, the repeal campaign is endorsed by 78 Nobel laureate scientists, nearly 40% of living Nobel laureate scientists, and numerous other prominent scientists.  It has also been endorsed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and other major science and educator organizations in Louisiana and the United States.  
In addition, thousands of clergy members, who are part of the Clergy Letter Project, have joined the repeal campaign. Reverend Welton Gaddy, President of the Interfaith Alliance, said, "(The repeal effort) represents the best thinking in American science, the best thinking in American religion, and it also reflects the United States Constitution."
Over 70,000 people from Louisiana and around the country have signed a petition and other petitions in support of this repeal.
The conservative Thomas Fordham Institute stated the Louisiana Science Education Act creates “anti-evolution pressures (that) continue to threaten state science standards.” In its evaluation of Louisiana’s education system, the Thomas Fordham Institute called the LSEA a “devastating flaw.”
Zack Kopplin, the student who began the campaign against the law said: 
“America needs a scientific revolution; a Second Giant Leap for Humankind.  Fighting for a repeal of Louisiana’s creationism law is ground zero of this revolution.
“We need a grassroots movement of students who stand up and demand their public officials to support evidence-based science.”  
Supporters of the repeal believe they will see a breakthrough this year because Louisiana’s public officials are becoming increasingly pro-science.  This spring, the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology lifted a boycott of New Orleans (a boycott still remains on the rest of Louisiana), which had begun after the passage of the Louisiana Science Education Act.  The boycott was lifted after the New Orleans City Council voted unanimously to support the repeal of Louisiana’s creationism law, and the Orleans Parish School Board banned creationism from their classrooms in reaction to the passage of this law..
The bill to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act in 2012 was defeated in committee, by a vote of 2-1. 
“We believe that this spring we can muster the votes we need to pass,” Kopplin said.


  1. Sorry to have to put a 'captcha' in here to comment, it's temporary. I've been inundated with spam comments and had to do something. Thanks.

  2. The Louisiana Science Education Act is misguided. It makes Louisiana look backward to most outsiders. It mars the separation of church and state in Louisiana and uses taxpayer funded schools to teach religious ideas. If a person wants their child to become acquainted with these religious ideas, let them do it through Sunday school. It is unfair to teach one religion's version of history as science.

  3. Public Schools can barely teach math and science. Only a gifted Christian Teacher can teach creation in physics, chemistry, geology, genetics, biology and astronomy. We don't have many in our area and they are all at private schools. The public schools do an excellent job in raising up children that "hate" God or see God as irrelevant. IF you don't believe me, then find one public school child above the age of reason that can defend God's creation in a debate with an evolutionist. None of them are prepared to defend their faith when they go off the college.

  4. Only a gifted Christian Teacher can teach creation in physics, chemistry, geology, genetics, biology and astronomy. <<<

    I am sure there are many agnostic and or other religion teachers that are very gifted in reaching their students.

  5. There is no such law as the "separation of church and state". Liberals have used it for decades as a way to silence their conservative opponents. If a liberal doesn't like the argument or the action, they simply charge that it is religious in nature and banish it from the public debate.

    The problem with the public school system is that there is far too little debate on things which are theoretical (unproven), no knowledge or education in logic, too much pontificating and indoctrination. Rather than teaching kids HOW to think, it teaches kids WHAT to think.


Rules of the road:
1. No personal attacks or insults.
2. No accustory statements about wrongdoing or criminal acts against anyone.
3. Say all you want about the pros and cons concerning the candidates and the issues, or the general subject of the blog post, just follow Rule #1 and Rule #2.